Approval of Journal Entries (avoiding management letter comments, part 6)

One part of a good system of internal controls is having all general journal entries reviewed.  This is also a key part of the segregation of duties in that someone other than the person making the journal entry reviews it.  This review is done to help prevent errors such as adjusting the wrong accounts and transposing numbers.  It also helps protect against fraud by making sure there is a valid reason for the journal entry and someone is not just increasing revenue to make the organization appear better.

Depending on the size of the organization, it can be difficult to determine who should be reviewing the journal entries.  If there are two or more people in the accounting department, one person can be the reviewer while the other person makes the entries.  If there is only one person in the accounting department, then it is necessary to go outside the department to get the journal entries reviewed.  This can be done by have the president or executive director be involved.  A Board member is also a good person to have review the journal entries.

There are also different ways to review the journal entries.  At some organizations each journal entry is reviewed prior to posting.  Other organizations review the entries on a weekly or monthly basis after they are posted.  One of the important things to remember is to document the review and approval.  The simplest way to do this is to print out the journal entries and have the reviewer initial them.  This should then be saved as support.

This is part 6 of a continuing series on common management letter comments.  Click here to read part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4, and part 5.

#nonprofit #nonprofitaccounting #fraud #internalcontrols